<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Protect Your Privacy When You Register Your Domain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cloudmixer.com/protect-privacy-register-domain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cloudmixer.com/protect-privacy-register-domain/</link>
	<description>Mixing New Media in a Mind Cloud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 05:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Appraisal Scams &#124; Cloud Mixer - Mixing New Media Ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudmixer.com/protect-privacy-register-domain/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Appraisal Scams &#124; Cloud Mixer - Mixing New Media Ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 07:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudmixer.com/?p=291#comment-46</guid>
		<description>[...] subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.Powered by WP Greet BoxThe other day I wrote a post about privacy whois on domain name records and mentioned one of the upsides of privacy whois, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.Powered by WP Greet BoxThe other day I wrote a post about privacy whois on domain name records and mentioned one of the upsides of privacy whois, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Edmonds</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudmixer.com/protect-privacy-register-domain/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Edmonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudmixer.com/?p=291#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Hi Terry,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Its very true that google does use some of the domain details in their algorithms, such as the length of registration of the domains (on my own domains I register then 10 years in advance....i can feel some subject matter for another article coming on!) however I was not aware that using private whois can affect your serps. I will have to look into that claim and test it it I think.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However it should be noted that if you do opt for a private whois, then try to have the following pages on your site: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- accessible contact page with all contact details&lt;br&gt;- privacy policy (p3p compliant - hmm...however p3p project is on hold)&lt;br&gt;- legal page (include jurisdictional info of the site owner)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know one of the reasons of private whois is to remain anonymous so putting all your contact details negates that but if you want to be treated legit, then you have to appear legit. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of the main reasons for opting to have a private whois on a domain is noted below, to avoid &quot;whois marketeers&quot; who use the details of whois records to send automated letters or emails.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I personally don&#039;t have any reason to hide my own whois details and I am pretty wary of the spam and domain soliciting however I get at least one email or phone call per week from clients telling me they have either received a letter or phone call from a person or company claiming someone is going to register the .xyz equivalent of their main domain but of course the client has the option to buy it first for $250 (or some other unreasonable sum).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is usually a good reason to opt out of public whois.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However I have some clients who simply don&#039;t want to be found and want to remain anonymous. I don&#039;t really need to question their reasoning but of course if one of their concerns about their business is serps plus they want to remain private then they should seriously reconsider the private who is option especially if using private whois is proven to affect your serps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Terry,</p>
<p>Its very true that google does use some of the domain details in their algorithms, such as the length of registration of the domains (on my own domains I register then 10 years in advance&#8230;.i can feel some subject matter for another article coming on!) however I was not aware that using private whois can affect your serps. I will have to look into that claim and test it it I think.</p>
<p>However it should be noted that if you do opt for a private whois, then try to have the following pages on your site: </p>
<p>- accessible contact page with all contact details<br />- privacy policy (p3p compliant &#8211; hmm&#8230;however p3p project is on hold)<br />- legal page (include jurisdictional info of the site owner)</p>
<p>I know one of the reasons of private whois is to remain anonymous so putting all your contact details negates that but if you want to be treated legit, then you have to appear legit. </p>
<p>One of the main reasons for opting to have a private whois on a domain is noted below, to avoid &#8220;whois marketeers&#8221; who use the details of whois records to send automated letters or emails.</p>
<p>I personally don&#39;t have any reason to hide my own whois details and I am pretty wary of the spam and domain soliciting however I get at least one email or phone call per week from clients telling me they have either received a letter or phone call from a person or company claiming someone is going to register the .xyz equivalent of their main domain but of course the client has the option to buy it first for $250 (or some other unreasonable sum).</p>
<p>This is usually a good reason to opt out of public whois.</p>
<p>However I have some clients who simply don&#39;t want to be found and want to remain anonymous. I don&#39;t really need to question their reasoning but of course if one of their concerns about their business is serps plus they want to remain private then they should seriously reconsider the private who is option especially if using private whois is proven to affect your serps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craigedmond</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudmixer.com/protect-privacy-register-domain/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>craigedmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudmixer.com/?p=291#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Hi Terry,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Its very true that google does use some of the domain details in their algorithms, such as the length of registration of the domains (on my own domains I register then 10 years in advance....i can feel some subject matter for another article coming on!) however I was not aware that using private whois can affect your serps. I will have to look into that claim and test it it I think.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However it should be noted that if you do opt for a private whois, then try to have the following pages on your site: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- accessible contact page with all contact details&lt;br&gt;- privacy policy (p3p compliant - hmm...however p3p project is on hold)&lt;br&gt;- legal page (include jurisdictional info of the site owner)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know one of the reasons of private whois is to remain anonymous so putting all your contact details negates that but if you want to be treated legit, then you have to appear legit. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of the main reasons for opting to have a private whois on a domain is noted below, to avoid &quot;whois marketeers&quot; who use the details of whois records to send automated letters or emails.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I personally don&#039;t have any reason to hide my own whois details and I am pretty wary of the spam and domain soliciting however I get at least one email or phone call per week from clients telling me they have either received a letter or phone call from a person or company claiming someone is going to register the .xyz equivalent of their main domain but of course the client has the option to buy it first for $250 (or some other unreasonable sum).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is usually a good reason to opt out of public whois.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However I have some clients who simply don&#039;t want to be found and want to remain anonymous. I don&#039;t really need to question their reasoning but of course if one of their concerns about their business is serps plus they want to remain private then they should seriously reconsider the private who is option especially if using private whois is proven to affect your serps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Terry,</p>
<p>Its very true that google does use some of the domain details in their algorithms, such as the length of registration of the domains (on my own domains I register then 10 years in advance&#8230;.i can feel some subject matter for another article coming on!) however I was not aware that using private whois can affect your serps. I will have to look into that claim and test it it I think.</p>
<p>However it should be noted that if you do opt for a private whois, then try to have the following pages on your site: </p>
<p>- accessible contact page with all contact details<br />- privacy policy (p3p compliant &#8211; hmm&#8230;however p3p project is on hold)<br />- legal page (include jurisdictional info of the site owner)</p>
<p>I know one of the reasons of private whois is to remain anonymous so putting all your contact details negates that but if you want to be treated legit, then you have to appear legit. </p>
<p>One of the main reasons for opting to have a private whois on a domain is noted below, to avoid &#8220;whois marketeers&#8221; who use the details of whois records to send automated letters or emails.</p>
<p>I personally don&#39;t have any reason to hide my own whois details and I am pretty wary of the spam and domain soliciting however I get at least one email or phone call per week from clients telling me they have either received a letter or phone call from a person or company claiming someone is going to register the .xyz equivalent of their main domain but of course the client has the option to buy it first for $250 (or some other unreasonable sum).</p>
<p>This is usually a good reason to opt out of public whois.</p>
<p>However I have some clients who simply don&#39;t want to be found and want to remain anonymous. I don&#39;t really need to question their reasoning but of course if one of their concerns about their business is serps plus they want to remain private then they should seriously reconsider the private who is option especially if using private whois is proven to affect your serps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Protect Your Privacy When You Register Your Domain &#124; Cloud Mixer - Mixing New Media Ideas -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudmixer.com/protect-privacy-register-domain/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Protect Your Privacy When You Register Your Domain &#124; Cloud Mixer - Mixing New Media Ideas -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudmixer.com/?p=291#comment-33</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by The Cool Crowd and cloudmixer. cloudmixer said: Blogged:- Protect Your Privacy When You Register Your Domain http://bit.ly/194lYz [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by The Cool Crowd and cloudmixer. cloudmixer said: Blogged:- Protect Your Privacy When You Register Your Domain <a href="http://bit.ly/194lYz" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/194lYz</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Van Horne</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudmixer.com/protect-privacy-register-domain/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Van Horne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudmixer.com/?p=291#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Graig excellent points on reasons to remove public whois records. However, there is one other user/agent that webmasters should consider. Google is a registrar and is thought to use that whois info in it&#039;s algos so if your info is not public it has no age data for the domain and one could argue if one were super paranoid about SE spam (donning my TFhat here) they could wonder what you are trying to hide... Google could lose trust... and that is never a good thing. I say this because I once hid my data for exactly the reasons you cite... I&#039;ll never do it again. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graig excellent points on reasons to remove public whois records. However, there is one other user/agent that webmasters should consider. Google is a registrar and is thought to use that whois info in it&#39;s algos so if your info is not public it has no age data for the domain and one could argue if one were super paranoid about SE spam (donning my TFhat here) they could wonder what you are trying to hide&#8230; Google could lose trust&#8230; and that is never a good thing. I say this because I once hid my data for exactly the reasons you cite&#8230; I&#39;ll never do it again. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

