<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Modern Online Content Program &#8212; It Just Ain&#8217;t What It Used to Be!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cloudmixer.com/modern-online-content-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cloudmixer.com/modern-online-content-program/</link>
	<description>Mixing New Media in a Mind Cloud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 05:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie Haggstrom</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudmixer.com/modern-online-content-program/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie Haggstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 04:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudmixer.com/?p=394#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Thanks Justin,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The switch over from traditional article marketing is quite slow (old habits die hard?), but when you look at all the benefits of article placement, there&#039;s just no reason not to use it. I think others would be quite pleased with the results; it&#039;s simply a matter of finding the right topic/style and site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Justin,</p>
<p>The switch over from traditional article marketing is quite slow (old habits die hard?), but when you look at all the benefits of article placement, there&#39;s just no reason not to use it. I think others would be quite pleased with the results; it&#39;s simply a matter of finding the right topic/style and site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie Haggstrom</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudmixer.com/modern-online-content-program/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie Haggstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudmixer.com/?p=394#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Thanks Justin,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The switch over from traditional article marketing is quite slow (old habits die hard?), but when you look at all the benefits of article placement, there&#039;s just no reason not to use it. I think others would be quite pleased with the results; it&#039;s simply a matter of finding the right topic/style and site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Justin,</p>
<p>The switch over from traditional article marketing is quite slow (old habits die hard?), but when you look at all the benefits of article placement, there&#39;s just no reason not to use it. I think others would be quite pleased with the results; it&#39;s simply a matter of finding the right topic/style and site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Parks</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudmixer.com/modern-online-content-program/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Parks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudmixer.com/?p=394#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Im all for this Angie, though the technical parts regarding link juice flow was always something i assumed sucked in article marketing anyway because of the duplicate content issues and the distribution, but I think its becoming more prevalent now in regards how it is being treated by search engines and the lack of return gained.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This, in my opinion, is definitely the way to go:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Need a high quality link, but don’t want to spend large amounts of money on them and risk the wrath of Google? Look through the various blogs and websites in your industry as well as complimentary industries and select an ‘authority’ site.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im all for this Angie, though the technical parts regarding link juice flow was always something i assumed sucked in article marketing anyway because of the duplicate content issues and the distribution, but I think its becoming more prevalent now in regards how it is being treated by search engines and the lack of return gained.</p>
<p>This, in my opinion, is definitely the way to go:</p>
<p>&#8220;Need a high quality link, but don’t want to spend large amounts of money on them and risk the wrath of Google? Look through the various blogs and websites in your industry as well as complimentary industries and select an ‘authority’ site.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Modern Online Content Program — It Just Ain’t What It Used to Be! &#124; Cloud Mixer - Mixing New Media Ideas -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudmixer.com/modern-online-content-program/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Modern Online Content Program — It Just Ain’t What It Used to Be! &#124; Cloud Mixer - Mixing New Media Ideas -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudmixer.com/?p=394#comment-50</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Intuitive SM Image and Angie Haggstrom. Angie Haggstrom said: New @cloudmixer: The Modern Online Content Program — It Just Ain’t What It Used to Be! http://is.gd/40xuw [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Intuitive SM Image and Angie Haggstrom. Angie Haggstrom said: New @cloudmixer: The Modern Online Content Program — It Just Ain’t What It Used to Be! <a href="http://is.gd/40xuw" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/40xuw</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

